Sócrates is an AI system implemented by Brazil's Superior Court of Justice (STJ) to automate the examination of appeals and related decisions. It recommends normative sources and legal precedents, providing action suggestions to assist Ministers in their final decisions. The system focuses on data classification, employing natural language processing and unsupervised machine learning techniques trained on previous petitions and court decisions. It employs semantic analysis to screen and classify lawsuits and appeals, identifying cases with similar matters and researching court judgments that can serve as precedents for the case under examination. Sócrates also identifies cases with potential registration issues and supports the STJ's Corporate School in defining training needs.
Decision Support Systems
Judgment Drafting Assistance: These tools help judges draft judgments by suggesting relevant legal provisions, precedents, and potential outcomes based on the specifics of the case, including to help judges reduce potential extremes in their rulings by analysing and presenting previous sentencing decisions for similar cases.
Legal Research and Information Retrieval
AI-Powered Legal Research Tools: These tools assist in quickly retrieving relevant legal information, case law, and statutes, making legal research more efficient and comprehensive.
Document Analysis: AI systems analyze legal documents to extract pertinent information, helping legal professionals understand complex texts and precedents.
Training and Capacity Building
AI for Judicial Training: AI tools are used to develop training programs for judges and legal professionals, helping them understand and effectively utilize AI technologies in their work.
#analyzeAnalyze legal appeals and previous court decisions to identify relevant normative sources and legal precedents. The system enhances judicial decision-making by extracting key insights from historical cases.
#automateAutomate the classification of legal documents and case types, reducing manual workload for court officials. The system streamlines the processing of appeals by identifying cases that may not meet procedural requirements.
#predictPredict potential outcomes based on patterns in past court decisions and legal arguments. This helps judges assess the likelihood of appeal success and make informed choices.
The designations used and the presentation of materials throughout this repository do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of UNESCO and IRCAI concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas, opinions, and content presented in this repository are those of the authors; they do not necessarily represent the views of UNESCO and IRCAI and do not commit the Organizations.